thank you and thank you! now that we don't have a little dog biting at our ankles, we can carry on with our conversation lol ATTICUS states the answer is a number of days to something being received to receive something implies something is being sent, which would require a sender and this sender would have to be quite far away if a countdown is occurring with almost three years remaining and not knowing how many days have already past since the countdown began one could reach at a conclusion that something is being sent from very,very far away by someone very,very far away and that whatever is being sent is anticipated enough that someone has started a countdown until it is received which means it must be traveling at a constant speed from very,very far away to calculate such a countdown curious!
Very well done, Dale! I’m soooo impressed with you… flaggergasted1 .... (being totally useless at maths myself, )
Nope no disasters , and this info is crucial. So I don't want to get pulled into a guessing game... Ok. But your info is good. I will think of how I want to word what I will say.
NPL holds the distinction of developing the first operational cesium-beam atomic clock. Essen received funding for his clock project in 1953 and had a very reliable version running within two years. In a collaboration between Essen and Markowitz, the relative durations of the astronomical and atomic (cesium) seconds were measured over an averaging time of 2.75 years with a final determination that the cesium frequency was 9,192,631,770 ¿ 20 Hz. The definition of the second accepted internationally uses the exact number produced by this measurement Is it to do with radiation?
Ok much deliberation is needed... Once some time ago I through out some symbols characters.... This was just an effort to explain something else, ancillary . It turned out to get me in shit for ages... I mean I'm used to being in shit....but , ya know....come on.. I don't want a situation of that nature and frankly I didn't think you would get it this quick , so I hopping.... A bit. The amount of days is a countdown... To something being received.
If the earth was once smaller, say before a lot of seismic upheaval and there wasn't such a big bulge in the middle, the circumference of the earth could have been quite feasibly 24,133 miles . A smaller earth would also have a shorter solar year of around 5 years making it a 360 day year. This would make a lot of sense and answer a lot of questions. It also gives us maybe an average throughout space and time of where the earth is in certain cycles within the solar system. These numbers also resemble closely the precession of the equinoxes cycles.
I would like a moment to think , if you don't mind. And your right of course, you do deserve an answer in some way... And the name was really in many ways more intrepid than this.... You knew this was a puzzle... I was actualy more impressed with you , when you spotted a puzzle that you were jot alerted to
ATTICUS ok..... as i recall, i guessed your name a long time ago in the first puzzle that no one saw and now, i concluded this epic, time consuming, mathematical nightmare i think i deserve a straight answer...... just one, for my efforts....... i know you reward effort (heart), the knocked getting back three times, this is your motto so please, one man to another.... days to what, or for what?
Now you know why my poetry is shit, you try rhyming with numbes that big REALTIMEREALTIME Now the posts elsewhere, there the doozy The reward is the key But it won't be found until another is As the great spike said... Spring is sprung the grass is ris, I wonder where the birdies is.
if you take 24,133 as something like an astronomical cycle and divide it by 360 you get 67.0361111111 . This is really interesting George. Thank you very much for your hard work. I was way off the mark., it pops up so often in astronomy and geometry. So many patterns and parallels , natural cycles regarding this... Thank you...
good question at the time and of all the numbers i tried, 24 was the only one that lead to 67 appearing twice in the resulting sequence and being it's the amount of hours in a day it seemed thrice logical
I think your right , trust what you did , you got there If the characters work out , well........ Say it
Hold on you did, why did you get to 24 , rather where did you get that, that is the hard one... Explain, no fobbing , thanks
Ok , that is correct... And for the record I fort the 67's were a bit "obvious" looking back... But still , credit where credit is due... But I know there is a clue still in there all would miss, I mean it was very unfair, but I wanted to find a turning machine... You are very clever , well done , and I mean that mate, congratulations, and fuck, way to be obsessive...like it.
carrying on......... 24,133 x 67 =1,616,911 now, this seems illogical, yes? but sometimes the best way to get to the lowest common denominator is to make a number larger to then influence it by a logical reduction number remember finding least common denominators for fractions in grade school? revisit what you would do to the numerator and denominator multiplication and division larger leads to smaller but the number was not yet large enough more number crunching you'd all like to see the scribbling i did to come to this next step lol so......... when I multiplied 1,616,911 by 24, i came to the number 67,371.29166666667 the hours of the day and now two more 67's at the beginning and at the end believe me i crunched many, many numbers before arriving to this step but the 67 67 was a solid marker now to reduce once more logically, my first choice was to divide the previous number by 67 wouldn't that be your first inclination, too? 67,371.29166666667 /67 =1,005.541666666667 YES! hole in one lol no further action this feels still and i submit my answer to this puzzle as 1,005.541666666667
I am , very reluctantly impressed you jumped up $#^%¥€%. Anyway, now , how do you get from there here?
ok, the answer, but first, a little more of how i came to the answer obviously this would be a large number raw data, so to speak and what is it that we do with raw data? condense it analyze it etc.....etc......... 24133 is what i came to now what to do, what to do as you all well know (i hear the gossip too) i graduated from a training about two years ago one of the things i learned of was the string while the crows were stab stab stab stabbing away, i was silent in thought one number occurred to me more than any other over the course of the time this puzzle was on my mind at home, grocery getting, at the tailor, while working on projects 67 this was quite worthy of making note of and at the time add this number to the raw data see if the soup tastes any good lol i managed for a while seeking a meaningful arrangement until i came to this sequence and now, as a novelty, my charge is at 67 percent on my phone anyway 24,311
^^^^^^^^ a lot of graphite,eh? lol checking, checking, checking, as i said a couple days ago one wrong calculation and the whole balance is thrown off so at this point i began adding the values of each letter to each line for example, if line 1 was AAAAA AA AAA, it's value would be 10 easy enough But one wrong calculation upsets the whole applecart
