Law# 3 - CONCEAL YOUR INTENTIONS - Sociopathic, or not?

You deceiver! Nexus was always sold as a forum controlled by the members -- for, by, and of the members. I was the one who exposed the lie when Andy and I caught Richard using the Miserable-User module to harass Andy. You stood loyally by Richard then, despite his false denial, and even stood loyally by him months later when the members abandoned ship to form Universal Spectrum, fed up with Richard's dictatorial hypocrisy.

Your typical BS....

Your typical "attack the messenger" tactic.

Same old Zook. You don't disappoint.

 

My arguments on United People are all about the sinister nature of secret societies. There are no thanks buttons on UP. My support of every argument at UP that was ever made against secret societies ... is implied. Also, I don't usually waste time throwing confetti at arguments or perspectives that I agree with. The stuff that tickles my neurons is usually something that offends me or my perspectives. What, I'm now a sociopath for not explicitly supporting the obvious, e.g. the aforementioned JFK audio?

Your delusions are way past Pluto now, Chico ... and heading towards planet X.

If you think Nexus and Universal are private clubs. You are correct. If you think they are secretive clubs, you'd better stop shoving those pencils up your ass because the pain is obstructing your thinking faculties. Nexus and Universal have founding charters. When the charter is breached it is up to the moderating staff to adjudicate. Adjudication in a private club is neither sociopathic nor empathic ... it is a janitorial function. Adjudication in a private club that has no discernible power over society ... is apples to the oranges of "secret societies" that JFK is warning against.

By now, it should be obvious to the good folks here at Inphinet forum that Chico is attempting to remove all distinctions and direct everybody into the fog of generality ... with himself being the exclusive operator of the foghorn.

I'll be remiss if I didn't now segue into Fog Legs of the Brothers Warner:



"I don't ... I say I don't think this boy has all his maaarbles. Shakes his head when he means yes, nods when he means no. Say, that's a joke, son!"


Pax

 

I don't recall you ever expressing any admiration for Kennedy's speech. I have posted it myself several times, and you were never there expressing any support. Once again, this doesn't sound like the Zook I know so well. I suggest this is more evidence of your duplicitous plan to pretend to take my side of the issues ( 1 2 ) in order to grow your fake credibility.

You have proven in the past, by your actions as an habitual moderator and forum insider, to be very supportive of "secret societies" and the right of "private clubs", like Nexus and Universal Spectrum, to censor and ban members with impunity. This new facade you are displaying at Inphinet is definitely not you, Zook, and I will continue to point it out as you continue to use it. Sociopaths must be exposed, if we are to ever be free of their control.

 

JFK's speech on concealment is one of the greatest and prescient speeches of the last century, IMO.

Pax

 

The assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK marked my life. There was evil written all over those events. Even worse, the propaganda we were fed about those murders was far more evil than the actual events. I was already ashamed to be part of humanity knowing about the killings, but when I realized we had been lied to, I began to get angry.

 

​

 

Law of Truth # 3

Have intentions you don't need to hide.

If you have to hide your intentions, they are very likely bad intentions towards others. Have good intentions, and you won't need to hide them.

The ultimate "bad intention" is war. There is indeed a war going on right now, and you are in it. It is the war between good and evil, between non-sociopaths and sociopaths. It is the intent of the sociopaths to defeat the non-sociopaths and enslave them. Sociopaths, a tiny minority of humanity, have to hide this intention, otherwise the non-sociopaths, who are much more numerous, would easily defend themselves. So they do hide it, quite effectively, and the result is that non-sociopaths don't even know there is a war going on, and that they are losing badly.

Sociopaths hide their intentions because those intentions are bad intentions towards others.

I have Shezbeth to thank for this revelation.

 

Intentions are like daisies (e.g. Day's Eyes). In the morning light, fully opened, they are pleasant to the day's eye. In the evening, they close their petals and are just another unremarkable silhouette to the night's eye.

Concealing intentions is akin to nightsies, the same flower transmogrified into a dark silhouette.

Greene's 3rd law makes no provision for revealing intentions. He only instructs to conceal them. There is no balance in his recommendation. Ergo, he is biased in favor of darkness and concealment (as a means to self-empowerment).

Sociopathic.


Pax

 

How misleading is this statement, at only 50 seconds into the video!

We all know how important it is to be feared, right? Actually, it's not a good thing. And how often does respect depend on being unpredictable? Very rarely. So, conceal your intentions "and you will always have the upper hand." Because there is no such thing as having power unless you are feared and unpredictable. I'm sure Hannibal Lecter would agree. But a normal person would not.

Who comes up with this BS? Oh, right, it comes from studying sociopaths, who are obsessed with pursuing power and control over others via deception and manipulation. So we study the deviant 1% in order to instruct the normal 99% in how to behave like deviants? Who comes up with this BS? Oh, right, I already asked that question.

The first half of this video is very much a field manual for sociopaths, and the last half is an historical study of how famous sociopaths behaved in war and seduction (read deception and manipulation). Asking if this law is sociopathic is kind of a no-brainer, right? Hey, is that why they are dumbing us down, so that we get this one wrong?