I'll bite, as I could argue both ways on this one.
On the one hand:
We're all just weirdo's on the internet talking about whatever. There may be more or less truth to what is being said, but at the end of the day it is (IMO) both credible and appropriate to literally call the show Bullshit. In doing so, we would be avoiding any inclination or predisposition to try and position ourselves as the 'saviors of the world' or anything along those lines. Additionally, it serves as a disclaimer of sorts; what follows is the bullshit that some people are saying. No one can claim buyer's remorse because they listened to or followed emphatic bullshit.
Moreover, as you say if it gets out of hand we can always make a note "That's why its called bullshit". ^_~
On the other hand:
I will admit to finding the name a tad crass/pedestrian. I find that the former benefits can as easily be satisfied by 'Wackadoo' or any of the other suggestions, and is not necessarily dependent on 'Bullshit'.
Summary and Conclusion:
I find that either way (pro or con) is acceptable, and needn't be written in stone. If you want my complete opinion, I think picking a name for the show is far less significant and/or relevant than hosting the show. I suppose the name can be changed at any time, but putting together something that needs a name seems the opportune direction to proceed,... just sayin'. ^_~
P.S. I could further suggest that the scope, topics, theme, etc. of any discussion or programming might have a relevant impact on any proposed names.
Last edited: Aug 22, 2015
