InPHInet Forum Warriors

​

 

I had already privately guessed that was the case, that the poll was running continuously, and people could still vote or perhaps even change their votes. I wouldn't know directly, since I chose not to participate, believing that public polls are an extremely poor method of assessing sociopathy. After all, every four years, a majority of Americans actually choose a sociopath to be their president. That would never happen if the public could recognize a sociopath.

 

Zook's latest post at UP accuses Rose of changing the numbers in the poll she just posted above, allegedly because she has made a "bond" with me.

I am quite used to Zook making ridiculous claims about me, but it appears he is expanding his range to include those he has failed to deceive and manipulate.

Zook, I just don't see Rose being the conniving type. I think you are just accusing her of what you would do if only you were in her shoes.

Shame on you, Zook. But let's not dismiss your claim out of hand. Let's hear what Rose has to say.

 

Old Zook simply cannot stop twisting the truth to serve his purposes. Those purposes consist of:

• Explaining away his two suspensions at United People by member vote (4 years ago facepalm ).
• Explaining away my assessment and supporting evidence of him being a sociopath.
• Discrediting me in any way possible.
• Enhancing his "good name" and reputation.

After all these years, Zook has finally found the "smoking gun" that would expose his nemesis Chicodoodoo to the world as a liar and a cheat. I've known Zook for a long time now, and I know he would want the membership here to know this important truth. So I am sharing his post with everyone.

 

If you "author" a thread, doesn't that mean you are the writer of everything posted in that thread (i.e. you are the sole author, like with a book)? That would be a closed thread, with no distractions and uninterrupted continuity. I get that.

Then there would be an open thread, with many authors freely contributing, which is the standard type of forum thread. I get that, too.

My confusion seems to arise from the notion of combining the two types. Then you have a thread where the author (the authority) can modify, edit, delete, and censor anything they want. While the author may find that kind of power and control satisfying, anyone foolish enough to contribute to the thread and whose posts are changed, deleted, or censored may wonder why they bother to participate. They might be wiser to start their own competing thread where they have all the power, can comment as they wish (even about the other thread), and can exercise full control over any contributed posts from others. These others, if they are feeling abused or suppressed in this competing thread, may now want to start their own competing threads so that they can comment freely on the same subject. The whole situation seems problematic to me. Am I missing something here?

 

Disagreement and debate are not such undesirable things that they must be segregated to their own private space, are they? By removing them from their original context, much is lost. JFK spoke about the value of welcoming debate, criticism, and transparency. How can we get to the truth without doing the same?

 

No, but you are correct in that it wasn't "always". It was only after you found a way to record Skype conversations that you usually wanted to record our conversations. Before that, you did not ask to record our conversations. I should have used "often" in place of "always". Sorry for that minor error, which you grossly expanded into me "flat out fabricating stuff."

That's true too. I study sociopaths, and you are my resident sociopath, one that provides many useful, real-time illustrations of the very traits I am talking about. I have already expressed my gratitude to you many times for providing me with this service. You are still much appreciated, Zook, at least by me.

 

She joined United People with multiple (5, maybe more) sockpuppet accounts a few years back, unbeknownst to me, and proceeded to wreak havoc with our democratic voting system there, literally destroying it, since she could swing the vote however she chose. She also brought in a wrecking crew of associates to give her even more power. It was incredible to behold, a living demonstration of the 48 Laws of Power, and it gave me some real insight into the twisted mind of a sociopath. After that, she disappeared, as far as I know. I had the impression from talking with her a number of times that her intensive deception, manipulation, and game-playing on the forums was an addiction that was eating into her parenting time, and she knew she needed to quit and concentrate on her child. I'm assuming that's what she did, as she was a very intelligent woman. High intelligence is normal for most sociopaths.

I hadn't heard anything quite like that. There was a time when GW was roasting Celine on her blog site, and Richard negotiated a cease-fire, with both parties agreeing to pull their attacks down from public view. That's the way sociopaths do business, by the way, when there is mutual blackmail going on.

 

This is just more Chicodoodian BS, good folks. Why would I ask anyone permission to record them if I really had sinister intentions (let alone sweetly ask them, whatever the truck that means)? There were, indeed, a few times when Chico did not give consent to being recorded and I obliged by not recording. The times that I did record him (also few in number), it was to protect myself against his two-faced behavior (that he is known for on the general United People forum). The archives hold that behavior in volume, which is a boon for me because I can point out Chico's mischief whenever the need arises. Skype's archiving system does a similar job in preserving text chat ... but not audio conversations. To guard against possible audio mischief on skype, and too, for a future reminisce down memory lane, I sometimes record my long conversations. But I always seek permission first. I generally don't skype much outside family relations in any event. Indeed, Chico is perhaps the only nonfamily relation that I've ever skyped for multiple long conversations, you know, beyond the usual 5 to 10 minutes. There was a time when Sid (the carrot guy) would initiate skype chats with me and I may have had one or two medium-length conversations with Sid. But that is it.

In the end, with regards to Chico, none of our skype chats were ever published because I was adequately satisfied that he didn't distort anything that was said in them. You can rest assured I would have published had Chico tried to distort anything. But really, our skype chats were just long conversations - on many issues and often philosophical in nature - and largely civil, with a few angry moments here and there. Come to think of it, it was only after I discovered a software program called MP3 Skype Recorder, that I first started recording anybody. By this time Chico and I already had multiple long conversations that went unrecorded. So when Chico intimates about whether he should "mention that Zook was always desiring to record our Skype calls" ... he's flat out fabricating stuff. But that's just Chico being Chico ... adding strands to a tangled web and entangling himself in his own deceit. Poetic justice always comes back to whack the unjust sooner or later. You gotta love it.

In any event, you can see Chico drag my name into almost every post he makes about sociopaths, which is just about every other post he makes. Hitler writes something in Mein Kampf that is relevant here ... "If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself. "

No wonder Chico admiires Hitler. What better mentor for a conditioned sociopath than a genetic one? Wot?

Pax

 

Holy Dystopia, Batman! I didn't know it was like 1984, with Big Brother sharing your life!

I know Sidious somewhat, having Skyped with him a number of times. He seems like a good man to me, not at all like Mr. IceCold, who is a vicious sociopath. I tangled with him constantly at Avalon, and at Atticus1.

There be sociopaths about... IceCold and Ms. Ugly Vicious. Just like vicious sociopath Hillary Clinton -- "We came, we saw, he died."


Hillary Clinton on Gaddafi: We came, we saw, he died

Kudos to Horse for being repulsed. I am the same way with Hillary.

I remember complaining about polls like that at Atticus1! Those are the kinds of polls sociopaths do -- deceptive, manipulative, and self-serving. I remember Stephen did not seem to appreciate my astute observations at that time. Zook is trying to do the same thing here with his Hitler poll, which is so laughable to me. He just never learns. And that's the way it is with sociopaths. They can be nothing but their horrible selves. They cannot change their spots.

Absolutely, he recorded it. As I mentioned before, GypsyWoman did the same thing to me, and that was her standard operational procedure, recording everything without telling so that she could data-mine it for blackmailing purposes if needed. Why? Because that's the way sociopaths think.

GW was quite frustrated, however, as there was nothing she could blackmail me with. That's what is so rewarding about me exposing sociopaths -- they have no power over me! I have nothing to fear from them. Zook has been digging fruitlessly for years trying to find the dirt on Chico, but he still has nothing and has to invent the most ridiculous of stories. Whereas I simply have to rely on the truth, which is so much easier.

Truth really rocks!

Should I mention that Zook was always desiring to record our Skype calls? At least Zook would sweetly ask (a smooth operator, that Zook), unlike the more severe sociopaths. I usually had no objections, even though I knew why he was doing it. He simply wanted material to "twist and shout" about in future posts. Good old Zook! Like Shezbeth, Zook doesn't disappoint.

 

You are being conned , Rose.

Chico, in knowing that his gig is being exposed, is trying to wear the robes of the information provider ... when his own behavior on UP and the forums that's he's been banned suggests that he is nothing but a disinformation artist.

That's what these fifth columnists do.

David Sweeney's 25 observables of these disinfo artists is pretty well spot on. Chico has committed many of the observables himself. His most recent two-faced argument, e.g. to seed confusion, is his contention that Hitler was not a sociopath.

Each time I presented evidence that Hitler was indeed part of the Zionist deception, e.g. their man in Berlin charged with the task of starting a war theatre in Europe (as per Norman Dodd's exposee of the 1909 minutes of the Carnegie Endowment For International Peace) ... Chico would argue against the evidence. He tried to dismiss Dodd has an insider. He also used technical reasons for dismissing Dodd's evidence, curiously enough by correctly identifying the fact that CEFIP was not even instituted until 1910, a year after the minutes were purported to exist. Fair enough. There was room for discrepancy because while CEFIP did begin in 1910, The Carnegie Endowment Fund (CEF) had already existed by that point. My research pointed to CEFIP, not CEF ... I was merely using Norman Dodd's own terminology of CEFIP.

Here's more of that discussion on UP:
http://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?p=18865#p18865

To be sure, an honest truthseeker would not let such a small technical discrepancy override the contents of the meeting, which were indeed recorded and which Norman Dodd and his secretary, Katherine Casey, did expose. But that is exactly what Chico did. He tried to throw out the evidence on a technicality because the evidence was part of a greater preponderance of evidence that connected Hitler to the Rothschild bankstering empire. He had already made up his mind to present Hitler as a hero ... on the spurious grounds that because mainstream media vilified Hitler, then Hitler must be a good man. Did it ever occur to him that both mainstream media and Hitler were evil ... and that the enemy of an enemy is not necessarily a friend? Of course, it did. He's not as dumb as his writings suggest. The evidence of false dichotomy is ubiquitous. The bankster empire sends a group in one direction; another group in the opposite direction ... turns them both to face each other ... and sounds the cannons to start the charge against each other. Divide and conquer both the winners and the losers simultaneously. The US bicameral system is the most obvious example of false dichotomy.

So why does Chico think that Hitler (one agent of this empire) is better than mainstream media (another agency of the same empire)? Because he's not a truthseeker. He's a fifth columnist and gatekeeper. The "Hitler is not a sociopath" repackaging is just as ridiculous as the "Uncle Zook is a sociopath" packaging. Which is why I question Chico's self-proclaimed expertise on the subject matter of sociopathy ... his criteria should be inspected and exposed for what it is: air molecules in Chico's winds of war.

Pax

ps: Forget Hitler's connections to the bankster empire. Hitler's own words - or words that he himself had taken credit for - can be found on sundry topics in that infamous book, Mein Kampf ... question begs ... can anyone other than a sociopath hold such views as can be found in Mein Kampf? I mean, those views may have value in instinctive jungle-blueprinted alpha male organizational societies, to be sure ... but we're talking about advanced thinking societies in which the term sociopath has been constituted and is in vogue.

ps2: I don't know how to create polls on this forum, Rose ... but if you can create a poll for me with the title: "Is Hitler a sociopath or not a sociopath?" ... that would be appreciated. The results of such a poll would be illuminating.

ps3: If you think my post has better topical relevance on Inphinet Forum Warriors, please move it there.

 

I'm confused. Let me summarize:

• Mark is LightestSon, administrator at InPhiNet.
• Rose is Rose, administrator and founder of InPhiNet.
• Rose thinks LightestSon needs to apologize for something, but what?
• LightestSon is miffed and responds with a poster of Stephen.
• Horse, husband of Rose, writes a novelette of intriguing fiction loosely based on Stephen's imaginative lies. How does Horse know so much about Stephen, since Horse never does forums? Oh, right, Rose confides in him, since they are married.

That's about all I know at the moment. Maybe Rose or LightestSon can fill in the rest of the story. Or maybe Horse can, as he may be the most informed of any of us!

 

Don't forget to mention that admission is free! An incredible entertainment value!

 

And I hope everyone does. You have been playing this con for years, always claiming "the archives hold it", but a careful examination of UP posts always proves you wrong. Just search for all posts at UP from UncleZook containing the word "archives".

You're busted, Zook. Again.

And who has the gall to lie like that? Sociopaths.

Remember this? It's still a classic post, as the video says it all...



American Beauty Drive Thru Scene Kevin Spacey

 

you should tell them the truth

 

lol your proving my point micromanaging my apology now