InPHInet Forum Warriors

No twisting. The people here have the link back to the archives to verify everything I stated, and, too, your calumny.

You reset the polls after some members in good standing left because you were acting like Captain Queeg (Humphrey Bogart in The Caine Mutiny). While those members were still there, i had a 60% vote not to ban me. Likewise, you had a 60% vote not to sanction you. The good members voted in my favor to get me to 60%. Mags, Andy, Screech Owl and her associates and sockpuppets voted in your favor to get you to 60%. Then when the good members left, the votes to not ban me vanished ... leaving my votes in a deficit situation (25%) ... at which point I was banned for several days. No doubt, your vote of confidence probably went to the top after your detractors were silenced ... not unlike Saddam's democracy, I'm sure.

There's an eighth reason, [8] ... the facts expose your deceptive portrayal of yours truly, namely, as someone who engages in con games. Your best hope is that nobody checks the factual record.

As for reason [7] ... I readily admit that my good name is important to me. I've carried it across a half-century with only a few minor scratches on it - mostly accumulated when I was in my 20's and loaded with youthful indiscretions - and I won't have some tinpot gateswinger and pasturekeeper take shots at it without great personal cost to themselves. As I am obliged to collect a price from you only as long as the facts are observed, the archives are the biggest weapon that I possess. To your credit, I don't think you're a purger ... merely a slanderer out slandering his debate opponents in the gamble that no one will be interested in inspecting the archives for veracity. For your sake, I hope no one does.

Pax

ps: I didn't want things to get to this point. Indeed, I do have empathy and more than baseline consideration for your mental illness ... but your incessant trolling and dragging my good name through your crayola-colored imaginarium of sociopathy - at every opportunity and virtually every thread on your own forum and now here on Rose's forum - had long surpassed sublime and may have even transited past ridiculous.

 

Is that who I think it is??? If you have read any of my posts on InPHInet, I was criticized for referring to him as some kind of genius actor. Well, now that I have seen his glamorshot, all can see the shining talent of which I spoke. So who's laughing now?

Does existence have a purpose? Most actors change their names. So Atticuss, WhoDeenE, WhoLaGun, and others are finally explained. Although I am not a filmaholic, I think I may have seen seen his signature character in many movies. One, I remember was a scifi remake. I think I saw him in The Day the Egg Stood Still.

Since I am not videophile, I don't look at every movie. I am hoping others may have seen his appearances? We need video in real funny situations. I have started writing a song called Hair of the Dog. It has already been sold to Sony. Finally InPHInet will make millions to offset Rose's hair cuts. We are now working on a Broadway play starring "you know who" as Bertrand Russell.

I always saw a greenish halo around the his posts. Especially when he was in Texas at the SuperCollider. I was there in a black hawk heliocopter. Yeah, I saw him lurking around in the brush. Ten seconds away from his death, I gave the order not to fire. We hovered and watched him sneak back to an awsome BMW. But just for fun, as he passed through customs, my secret counter profile division (see we are really on the same side), we insisted, that is, the American Government, on a full body search. All we found was a #2 pencil.

 

Your entire post makes a mockery of "factual integrity", Zook. facepalm

Your twisting of real events into fantasy, which you do to make yourself look genuine and credible, just as you did back then (nearly four years ago), makes me chuckle. I can't help but chuckle, because you do it so well! You are quite entertaining, especially since I know you are obliged to deceive and manipulate by nature of your psychology. You work so hard at it, and pour so much effort into it, but it is all for naught, because you cannot adhere to the truth.

I'm not going to debate you on your allegations for the following reasons:

1. Almost nobody cares about your many suspensions from UP.
2. I already responded to your bogus allegations back then, and like all my posts, those responses still stand.
3. All member posts are still at UP and have never been censored. They tell the story more accurately than you.
4. You would be wasting my time, because there is no limit to the "twists" you can create.
5. You are still a member at UP. You keep coming back, on your own volition.
6. My purpose is not to make you look bad, though you make it unavoidable.
7. And unlike you, I am not concerned with my image or "good name". I don't need to be, because I don't wear a mask.

 

The following excerpt from the Law# 2 - NEVER PUT TOO MUCH TRUST IN FRIENDS - Sociopathic, or not?
thread, in which Chico was trying to suggest that I was playing con games at UP many times ... is being moved here so it can be discussed and evaluated for factual integrity.

Well, here's one revealing post at United People that I made on Mar 28, 2012 ... which exposes Chico's tampering with the polls to get the desired result that he wanted. To set the background, there was a 60% vote by the membership not to ban me. Soon after that, the forum deteriorated to the point that some genuine posters left the forum or had their memberships revoked (don't remember the exact details) to which Chico euphemistically referred as "members coming and going". The good folks that left understood that I was a genuine truthseeker like themselves which is why they voted against my potential ban. But after their purge, Chico reset the polls ... the membership that remained was largely antagonistic to myself and was pro-Chico. So a poll that started as 60% not wanting to ban me ... ended after the reset with only 25% not wanting to ban me. I was summarily banned.

Here, one might ask if being banned from a pirate ship is a badge of honor. And the answer is ... most definitely!

Of course, Chico consistently represents that lawless period of United People's rolling and tossing on the turbulent seas, as if it was constituted by genuine truthseekers ... and raises my banning in a false light, namely, that I was banned by the vox populi of good citizens ... when, in fact, much of that period during which I was banned (on numerous occasions) was occupied by a pirate ship attacking other forums, a pirate captain (Chico), and racketeers (Screech Owl, her close associates, her sockpuppets, and Mags and Andy). He has no shame in misrepresenting what actually happened.

Poetic justice prevailed ... because Chico eventually had to make Screech Owl and her associates walk the plank themselves because they started cannibalizing his forum. Chico banned Andy because Andy (to his credit) was a front row witness to Chico devolving into Captain Queeg and spoke up about it. Mags no longer posts there because he too eventually fell into disagreement with Chico (his co-partner in the quack theory that sociopathy was the root of today's global corruptions). After I scuttled that theory with my fact-based arguments exposing tribal organization as the prime culprit behind the bankster empire, the global corruptions, and full spectrum dominance, Mags no longer had any face to save or theory worth holding (wrt sociopathy as being the prime culprit).

In the end, what started as promise for a planar organization turned into a hidden pyramid with Chico on the capstone. Which is why it is mostly a one-man show today. I occasional post there because it is sad to see a man boast about a forum when all that is left is a soliloquarium. So there is as much pity for Chico as there is contempt for his behavior.


Pax

ps: Here's the link to United People and teh discussion on Chico resetting polls. I would read the entire thread to get a full grasp of what is going on ... if you have time to waste that is.

http://hm.dinofly.com/UP/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4227#p4227
beginExcerpt

This is outrageous! Chico has now assumed the role of emperor of this forum. Chico unilaterally made the decision to change the poll results. Instead of conducting a new poll where he could have gotten his results ... he purged a poll which had no business being purged, e.g. because no one was suspended. The only provision for a poll reset is if someone had been suspended.

At the time of the purge, Chico and I had a vote of confidence at 60% (6-4 in favor of nonSuspension).
TH and Andywight had a vote of neutral confidence of 50% (5-5 in favor of the status quo).
DSimon had a vote of nonconfidence at 40% (3-2 in favor of Suspension).

No one was voted for a suspension because no one triggered the 25% nonconfidence threshold that Chico had set.

So Andy requests that I be put on a poll for trolling (notwithstanding his many trolling remarks aimed at myself, e.g. Unclespook, etc.) ... and Chico obliges Andy by purging the original polls (which favored myself over Andy) ... and now is promoting that the membership can get to decide anew the pulse of United People's nation.

Chico made the original polls reversible. So if people really didn't want me around for a day or two, they would've just reversed their initial decision and removed their confidence in me ... and I would've got suspended. Chico knows this. This is the second time he interfered to change a poll. The previous time he altered a poll by redesigning it from 4 options to only two ... in the process, I lost some membership confidence.
Then there was the poll I took out on Andy's Stasi-style tactics against TH ... a poll which has condemned Andy at 80% (4-1):
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=517

Instead of taking Andy to task for any of the mischief he has performed on his forum, Chico has exposed his preference for the gatekeeper (Andy) over the truthseekers that Andy has pushed out (e.g. TH, Lee, Canzirka)
or is seeking to push out (Zook).

Good folks, this epiphany happened only moments ago - and I am seriously perturbed by it ... but here it is ... Chico may not be the truthseeker we all think he is. His record has been very clear so far: he has jumped in to do the bidding of a gatekeeper (Andy) time and again ... and he has done everything to oppose the significant truths that are being brought in to United People (by obfuscating about the facts and directing towards generalized principles). At the same time, Chico has shown an interest in propping up the trivial pursuits and soap operas that Andy is manufacturing.

I mean, how else are we to interpret Chico's preferred association with a proven gatekeeper, drama queen, Stasi-style data miner, and flyweight intellectual presented as a heavyweight by his friends and United People capstone clique members.
end

 

Not My Cross to Bear

 

On The Road Again

 

Shezbeth has left the building.

Would that be considered an aggressive exit? Possibly even therapeutic?

 

I never said that, I said in order to fairly review the 48 Laws, one must include the preface.

Skype:

and Pub:

I did NOT say that the endeavor or intent was unfair, I was insisting on the Preface in order to ensure fairness.

 

facepalm More of the same Chico? <sigh> I hope members of the audience appreciate that by keeping him in my 'area' I am helping to keep him out of theirs,....

Chico, like a neutered dog you just don't get it and probably never will.

You swear up and down that people are 'starting to see' or 'my mask is slipping' and all sorts of omenous bullshit. The only thing that is being readily seen is how much of an insufferable douchebag you are, as evidenced by your behavior/rationale. So you got pwnd by some sociopaths? Big deal! Get over it, and quit crying to people who have nothing to do with it, and especially quit pointing the finger at everyone else.

Oh no, the comments haven't been complimentary? <gasp> Off to a convent for me! bintingnails

Seriously,... this is just getting stupid. Hiding in plain sight? I haven't hidden anything, I've been loads more forthright than your self-righteous ass, not to mention the truckloads of patience I've displayed thus far.

Seriously people, he's been a prick like this from the moment he started. Wanna see? (since, he went ahead and quoted this same conversation himself, it should be fair game right?).

This is went on behind the scenes of the 'Deception' thread,... sorry about the poor formatting, but new posts are separated by an initial '-'.

Anyone else notice that Chico has confessed to having two sociopaths for friends?

P.S. Has anyone actually read the book, or is this all just knee-jerk response? Better question, has anyone read the back cover? As in, holding the book in your hand? If not, here's a handy reference list based off the .PDF file in the ME thread:

P.P.S. Maybe Chico's up in my grill cuz he knows I'm not a sociopath and wants to take his aggression on me,... like its therapudic n shit.

 

These two ( 1, 2 ) and this one are not meaningless lists, Shezbeth. In fact, they are all describing the same thing. And people here are starting to "see" the real you. You've been hiding in plain sight all along, right in front of our eyes. And this is how sociopaths hide, exactly as described in your venerated 48 Laws of Power. But now we have new eyes, trained eyes, eyes that can see that with every post you make, you expose yourself ever more. This very thread and your posts in it are another example of that. Look at the people who have commented here, and look at what they are saying. They see you. You are not invisible any more.

And that changes everything.

 

<looks over his thorough list of objectives and considerations>

Lost by my own rules? My my, you clearly are out of your element. Perhaps it is best that you sit this one out. ^_~

Next time you might come up with a better cover story though,....

 

Come on old son... you can do better than this

You've lost by your own rules and all I did was call the premise lame, which it still is btw. I'm not caring about challenging or beating you at the internet keyboard warrior convention but I'm fairly sure you'll reply anyway. Either way, I'm bored now, so have fun!

 

my friend bill hicks here sums this sitch up pretty nice lol

 

... not goading,... right,....

It's taken up until post 3 for you to even indicate what you find objectable, all the while throwing out terse and unconstructive jibes? No,... 'not goading' is the antithesis of what you were doing.

But let us say for the moment that you legitimately weren't goading. If you think the subject is lame, why are you participating? Is it from a desire to see it transition from what it 'was' to what it 'could be'? How does dismissively dropping a single-syllable word help to better the situation?

That there is no particular topic is because I'll take on any topic. That I invite participants is because there are those present and in the periphery who have always wanted to 'put me in my place' or some such idea; this space is for any who might be harboring such feelings.

Shall we go on Phil?

 

I love losers.
Real actual losers are at the end the end of their rope.
They stop wanting themselves and ask for anything except themselves.
AKA, LONELINESS.

Get to the point?
EQUILIBRIUM.
The point between Ying & Yang, Night & Day, Day & Night is what holds us together.
I Love You both.

 

Live from a reel to reel somewhere long ago in the past:
Complete with alien clapping accompaniment.
Warning: Far from perfect or produced.
A Moment in Time