I don't know Code Monkey, I just have an awareness of him. He's sort of like the tech geek for 8 chan.
Discord is a gamer platform. It has lots and lots of people on it. Hundreds or more, maybe even thousands of channels.
I glanced through the article list but didn't read them.
What was said about Code Monkey and Discord?
Sundance has never been keen on Q. It seems to me that he has always distanced himself from the Q movement and material. I think this is to protect his own brand, he's been doing what's he's doing long before Q ever started posting on the 4 chan.
To me, the statement, "Trust the plan" seemed to come when there has been discouraging news in the MSM/contract media. I've always taken it as an intent to encourage people. I never took it to mean, don't think.
Many people opposed to Q, interpret it to mean, "
don't think, become a sheep of a different sort."
I've discovered that the people who write these sorts of articles don't actually read the Q posts. They make a lot of assumptions about what is said, and write from those assumptions.
An example from sundance's article would be that Q is making money from this, not true.
Some people who are doing videos and such may make some money, but likely not much. People donate to Praying Medic, and Neon Revolt sells a Q T-shirt. I don't have time to follow all the Q analyzers. Those are two of the more popular ones. But sundance seems to be trying to speak directly to Q, or to whoever he assumes to be Q in this article.
I read the Q posts directly, usually follow up on the links provided. (Thanks for the Q updates, Rose.
)
Most often I catch Praying Medics videos, but not always. And I glance through the aggregators and get a quick feel or sense of the thinking. Then I tuck it away in observer mode.
I find the Q information more helpful than MSM information. It more accurately predicts what is happening.
It helps keep me informed of key current events. Not all current events, but enough to be worth taking the time to read.
I often glance at Sundance's site, too. But don't always agree with his analysis.
One person I've found very accurate lately is Dave Janda. I watch his shorter videos on his channel, rather than the longer interviews with other people.
Is this helpful?
Click to expand...
