Featured SPYGATE ~ OBAMAGATE ~ RUSSIAGATE

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20180626/108500/BILLS-115HRes938ih.pdf​

 

https://www.cnsnews.com/news/articl...fbis-response-subpoena-new-deadline-5pm-today​

 

​

 

John Radcliffe (R-TX) said he's read hundreds of text messages, and if Clinton had led the "Russian Collusion" investigation, there would have been LESS bias. He asks why Susan Rice had White House cyber-security STAND DOWN on investigating Russian cyber-attacks if concerned about meddling. Rep John Radcliffe is on the Homeland Security Committee and says he has a question for the subpoenaed Peter Strzok that could also implicate James Clapper, John Brennan and others. EXPLOSIVE interview! The Peter Strzok deposition will take place Wednesday, June 27, 2018 behind CLOSED DOORS. (* Wikipedia says Peter Strzok is/was married to Melissa Hodgman, an associate director at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.)

​

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/23/fbi-russia-probe-documents-nunes-gowdy-goodlatte-667181
​

 

IG: Reviewing Whether Strzok's Anti-Trump
Bias Impacted Launch of Russia Investigation
​

 

Deadline Today for DOJ to Comply with Subpoena
​

 

​

 

Nunes Reveals the Reason Comey Reopened Hillary’s Case
​

 

Horowitz Testimony Rosenstein Hid Strozk's "Stop Trump" Text
​

 

Also standing out like a sore thumb: Horowitz testified about the fact that text messages originally released by the DOJ had the most damning (smoking gun?) Strozk/Page line "No, no he won't. We will stop it." removed. Horowtz was questioned regarding the chain of command for releasing the batch of texts. They ultimately ended up in Rosenstein's hands and were released by him. There was some obfuscation about the occurrence due to Horowitz testifying he located some of the replies later than original messages with investigative work. But, if I understand correctly all texts were intact when submitted to Rosenstein.

 

Gowdy's Opening Statement

Later in the hearing, Mr Horowitz explained there was no bias in the final conclusion decided by Page, Strozk and maybe 20 people handling the Clinton "matter". I don't think he will conclude the same finding of no bias in the FISA Abuse/Russia Investigation IG report 2.0. ​

 

Still listening to hearing, but here's some news:

​

 

Wow what a hearing today!
Began viewing late so far behind current time...
Just heard this, too!
Planning to fire Rosenstein on Friday?


Into 3rd hour..
Jordan just asked Horowitz when the next FISA Abuse IG Report should be completed.
Should begin with Strzok Russia Investigation and be explosive!
​

 

​

 

WATCH LIVE
Sen. Judiciary Cmte. hears testimony about IG report on FBI, DOJ and email probe
​

 

Excellent Interview
​

 

Live Video of Tomorrow's Senate Hearing
https://www.c-span.org/video/?44680...i-director-testify-clinton-email-probe-report

​

 

​

 

Senate Judicial Hearing on Monday, too...

​

 

IG Horowitz Testimony to Judiciary Committee June 19
Will be Live Here: https://judiciary.house.gov/hearing...-doj-actions-in-advance-of-the-2016-election/



Will he have some explaining to do???

​

 

DiGenova is the first person I have heard who agrees with me regarding Wray's "performance" yesterday.​

 

​

 

​

 

​

 

Personally don't care for sugar coating on my facts Wray.​

 

https://www.oversight.gov/sites/default/files/oig-reports/2016_election_final_report_06-14-18_0.pdf


https://oig.justice.gov/press/2018/2018-06-14.pdf​

 

How 7 words in the 500-page IG report give Donald Trump all the 'deep state' ammo he wanted:
PAGE: "[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!"
STRZOK: "No. No he won't. We'll stop it."
​

 

​

 

Report out Tomorrow ~ Has it been Scrubbed?
​