Featured WHAT'S NEXT? DEMs TRUMP HOAXES

​

 

Speaking of Soros...



​

The warning comes from none other than billionaire leftist George Soros himself. Soros wrote a scathing letter to Financial Times in which he argues that both Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg should be removed from their leadership roles at Facebook, because of they are allegedly “engaged in some kind of mutual assistance arrangement with Donald Trump that will help him to get re-elected.”

In his letter to Financial Times, Soros argues that he actually supports “more government regulation of social media platforms,” and makes the case that “Facebook does not need to wait for government regulations to stop accepting any political advertising in 2020 until after the elections on November 4.”

Click here to read in full Soros’s letter to Financial Times.

 

​

Former national security advisor Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn’s defense team filed a brief Tuesday with the court, asking once again to have Flynn’s case dismissed based on the court’s authority and the “government’s outrageous conduct and repeated Brady violations.”

The 19- page brief submitted by Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell comes on the heels of the appointment by Attorney General William Barr of Chief federal prosecutor from St. Louis, Jeffrey Jensen, to review the ongoing case against Flynn. According to reports, an official with the DOJ, said Jensen was selected weeks ago by Barr and is expected to review issues raised by Flynn’s defense team.

“We hope the government will seriously consider this brief and our prior briefing from the independent perspective Mr. Jensen can provide, and take the steps to remedy this injustice and restore Rule Of Law,” Powell told SaraACarter.com.

Powell has also stated that Flynn had been lied to by the FBI, leading Flynn to believe in the early stages of the bureau’s probe that he was not under investigation.

continue reading

 

Major Victory Against Soros Machine


Next Episode?

​

 

​

 

​

 

​

 

"AG Barr is Focused on Something Much Bigger that Will have Serious Ramifications"
"Durham Criminal Probe is Underway. It has gone deep. It has gone wide. It has gone far."


​

 

​

U.S. Attorney John Durham – charged with the criminal probe into the FBI’s Russia investigation of the Trump campaign – has been questioning CIA officials closely involved with John Brennan’s 2017 intelligence community assessment regarding direct Russian interference in the 2016 election, according to U.S. officials.

In May 2017, Brennan denied during a hearing before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence that its agency relied on the now debunked Christopher Steele dossier for the Intelligence Community Assessment report. He told then Congressman Trey Gowdy “we didn’t” use the Steele dossier.

“It wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had,” Brennan stated. “It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community assessment that was done. It was — it was not.”

However, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz confirmed in his report that the dossier was used in the Obama administration’s 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA). As stated in the IG report, there were discussions by top intelligence officials as to whether the Steele dossier should be included in the ICA report.

But upon careful inspection of Horowitz’s report, on page 179, investigators ask former FBI Director James Comey if he discussed the dossier with Brennan and whether or not it should be given to President Obama. According to the report, Comey told investigators that Brennan said it was “important” enough to include in the ICA — clearly part of the “corpus of intelligence information” they had.

According to a recent report by The New York Times, Durham’s probe is specifically looking at that January 2017 intelligence community assessment, which concluded with “high confidence” that Russian President Vladimir Putin “ordered an influence campaign in 2016.”

continue reading

 

AG Barr To Testify March 31st

​

re: delayed testimony
1. allow for public dissemination of critical facts [possible unseal(s)-declas] prior to world televised sit down.
Sometimes the necessary forum to update the American public is provided by those same people being investigated for….
Release to change strategy?
Watch what happens next!
Q

 

​

 

Don't Usually Agree with Napolitano but he's right on this...
​

 

"Time for Comeys & Clappers & Brennans of the World to get Very Nervous"


​

 

Maria & Nunes: Very Comprehensive Truth Synopsis

​

 

​

SORRY BARNEY.

Roger Stone played a large part in the election of Donald Trump. His best-selling book, “Clinton’s War on Woman” undoubtedly cost Hillary a great many votes. It was that devastating.

Hillary spent more campaign money than Trump. She had the fake news mass media and the Deep State Swamp on her side, but thanks to ‘deplorables’ such as Stone, she lost.

Hillary got even. She put her ‘Russia Collusion’ insurance policy into play. She paid for the bogus Steele Dossier, which meant Hillary was the one who colluded with a foreign country to influence our election. The FISA warrant system was abused and Trump and his campaign was spied upon illegally. Mueller’s Russia witch hunt began, which ended up costing our nation years of wasted time and millions in tax dollars. Mueller made sure he extracted revenge for Hillary by arresting Roger Stone. The special prosecutor put on a big show, too. Roger’s early morning arrest involved dozens of heavily armed FBI men. CNN was tipped off and they were there to capture footage of the humiliation. They wanted to make a big deal out of handcuffing the ‘bad man.’

Mueller found nothing, but Roger remained tangled in a legal web. Even though he did nothing wrong, they charged him with several bogus ‘federal crimes.’ These process crimes were flimsy at best—one due to a slip of memory by Roger. When the Russia case collapsed he should have been exonerated, but instead he was tried in a partisan town with a partisan judge and a partisan jury. He was found guilty. The partisan hold-over federal prosecutors at the Department of Justice recommended a very harsh sentence. The Deep State wanted revenge. Instead, Trump’s outrage caused them to quit their jobs in a huff.

Swamp draining in progress.

—Ben Garrison

​

 

​

 

​

 

​

 

New developments on the story already


​

President Trump has withdrawn his nomination of Jessie Liu to serve as a top Treasury Department official, Fox News has learned.

The president’s move to withdraw Liu’s nomination comes just hours after four Justice Department lawyers quit following a move by senior leaders at the department to overrule the prosecutors' judgment by seeking a lesser sentence for long-time Trump ally Roger Stone after he was found guilty of lying to Congress.

Liu is a former U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C., who before her nomination oversaw the prosecutions of Stone and former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn over charges of false statements to the FBI.

DOJ TO SCALE BACK 'EXTREME' STONE SENTENCE RECOMMENDATION

continue reading

 

The DC Cover-up That’s As Big As Spygate…

WOW WOW WOW WOW
This is big!!!!!
Thank you, Sundance!

​

The ramifications are far reaching:

• Who was Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein and DC Attorney Jessie Liu protecting?
• What institutional interests did Rod Rosenstein and Jessie Liu consider too stunning, too damaging, too overwhelming, to confront in their decision to allow such a weak plea contrast against such severe criminal conduct?
• Is it even possible for the United States Dept. of Justice to conduct a trial where members of the Gang of Eight were implicated in the activity?
• How could the institutions of the United States government survive the publicity of members within the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence conspiring with foreign and domestic actors to eliminate the President of the United States?
• How could the highest and most widely recognized U.S. media institutions (NYT, WaPo, CNN and more) survive exposure within that same trial. The media caught participating in a government effort (receiving leaked classified information) intended to eliminate the presidency of Donald John Trump?

The downstream consequences are quite dramatic. The answer to those questions could create an explosion strong enough to split the atom within the swamp.

___________________________________


continue reading lengthy detailed article
BOOM!​

 

​

 

​

 

Who Pays the Price?
What did Obama know?






​

 

​

 

​

 

​

 

​

 

​